Complete database of events related to the internal armed conflict in Peru, extracted from the Final Report of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (CVR). 5,159 events documented from 1817 to 2003.
During a thematic public hearing on September 4, 2002, the Peruvian Truth and Reconciliation Commission (CVR) discussed the misuse of antiterrorism legislation and violations of due process. The hearing highlighted how excessive powers granted to police and military forces led to human rights abuses, including torture and forced confessions, during …
During a public hearing held on September 4, 2002, Eleuterio Zarate Luján testified before the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (CVR) about issues in the judicial processes for terrorism and treason in Peru. The hearing highlighted concerns over the evaluation of evidence, where police actions and decisions were given undue weight, …
In 2002, the Constitutional Tribunal of Peru declared much of the anti-terrorism legislation enacted under former President Alberto Fujimori null and void. This decision followed rulings by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, which found violations of due process in the trials of individuals accused of terrorism and treason. As …
The Cantoral Benavides case involved a ruling by the court that the trial conducted under the 1995 law by the Fuero Común violated rights to judicial protection and due process as enshrined in the Pact of San José. The court's decision highlighted the need for Peru to align its judicial …
The case of Cantoral Benavides was addressed by the court on 18 August 2000, highlighting issues with the military jurisdiction in Peru. The court emphasized that military tribunals do not meet the requirements of independence and impartiality as per Article 8.1 of the American Convention, which are essential for due …
In Peru, during trials for terrorism, judges were allowed to remain anonymous to protect their safety. This practice, however, was criticized for violating the accused's right to a fair trial, as it prevented them from knowing who was judging them and from challenging potential biases. The system of 'faceless judges' …
The Inter-American Court of Human Rights declared the trial of Castillo Petruzzi and others before the Military Justice invalid and ordered a new trial. The Supreme Council of Military Justice annulled the previous sentence, and the case was moved to the Judicial Power for a new trial. The court emphasized …
The 'faceless courts' were established under decree law 25475 in Peru, creating a secret justice system where the identities of judges and prosecutors were concealed. These courts were justified as necessary for the safety of those judging terrorism cases. However, they were criticized for undermining the accused's right to due …
The Constitutional Tribunal of Peru declared that allowing military tribunals to try civilians for crimes such as treason and terrorism is unconstitutional. This decision aligns with the interpretation of the Constitution and international human rights instruments, emphasizing the right to a natural judge. The ruling highlights that civilians should not …
Decreto Ley 25728, enacted in Peru on September 18, 1992, allowed judicial bodies to convict individuals accused of terrorism and treason in absentia. This legislation was criticized for violating the right to a fair trial, as it disregarded the accused's presence and defense rights, contravening international human rights standards. Although …
In 1992, Peru implemented an anti-terrorism legislative model that established a secretive and exceptional justice system for prosecuting terrorism and treason. This system, known as 'judges without faces,' violated basic due process guarantees by keeping the identities of judges and judicial personnel secret. The Inter-American Commission on Human Rights criticized …
In 1992, a new antiterrorism legislative framework was enacted, leading to a significant increase in the number of innocent individuals wrongfully imprisoned. This legislation was criticized for violating fundamental rights and due process, resulting in numerous innocent people being prosecuted and convicted of terrorism or treason. The issue was highlighted …
Showing 1–12 of 12 events