The American Convention on Human Rights, also known as the Pact of San José, was adopted in 1969. It establishes a comprehensive framework for the protection of human rights in the Americas, obligating states to respect and ensure the rights and freedoms recognized in the convention. The convention is a …
The internal armed conflict in Peru began in May 1980, marked by significant human rights violations. The conflict involved subversive groups like Sendero Luminoso and MRTA, as well as state agents, leading to arbitrary executions and massacres. Despite international human rights treaties in place, such as the International Covenant on …
The Inter-American Court of Human Rights issued Advisory Opinion OC-9/87 on 6 October 1987, addressing judicial guarantees during states of emergency as outlined in the American Convention on Human Rights. The opinion emphasized the importance of maintaining judicial independence and impartiality, as well as upholding essential rights and means of …
On July 24, 1990, the Supreme Council of Military Justice in Peru confirmed the decision of the Permanent War Council of the Second Judicial Zone of the Army to archive the case involving the deaths of seven civilians. Despite evidence and admissions that the civilians were killed by gunfire, the …
In 1992, Peru implemented an anti-terrorism legislative model that established a secretive and exceptional justice system for prosecuting terrorism and treason. This system, known as 'judges without faces,' violated basic due process guarantees by keeping the identities of judges and judicial personnel secret. The Inter-American Commission on Human Rights criticized …
The 1993 Political Constitution of Peru enshrined the principle of legality, ensuring that no individual can be prosecuted or punished for an act that was not previously defined as a punishable offense by law. This principle is further supported by the 1991 Penal Code and the American Convention on Human …
In 1993, the Peruvian Constitution was amended to expand the conditions under which the death penalty could be applied. While the 1979 Constitution allowed the death penalty only for treason during external war, the 1993 amendment extended this to include treason during internal war, specifically in cases of terrorism. Despite …
On March 14, 2001, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights ruled against the Peruvian laws of 'Auto-amnistía' No. 26475 and No. 26492, which had previously allowed the release of members of the 'Destacamento Colina' involved in human rights violations. The court declared these laws incompatible with the American Convention on …
On March 14, 2001, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights ruled that Peru's amnesty laws, specifically Laws No. 26479 and No. 26492, were incompatible with the American Convention on Human Rights. These laws, which were enacted to provide amnesty for acts committed during the fight against terrorism from 1980 to …
On March 14, 2001, the Inter-American Court ruled unanimously that the amnesty laws 26479 and 26492 were incompatible with the American Convention on Human Rights, rendering them legally ineffective. This decision addressed the inefficiencies in the judicial system during the 1980s in dealing with terrorism, where many captured terrorists were …
The Inter-American Court of Human Rights ruled that amnesty laws, which aim to provide impunity for international crimes and serious human rights violations, are incompatible with the American Convention on Human Rights. This ruling, specifically in the Barrios Altos case, declared such laws to have no legal effect, prompting Peruvian …
The Inter-American Court of Human Rights ruled that the self-amnesty laws in Peru were incompatible with the American Convention on Human Rights. As a result, these laws were deemed to have no legal effect and could not obstruct the investigation and punishment of those responsible for human rights violations. This …
The Barrios Altos case was a significant legal proceeding in Peru, where the Inter-American Court of Human Rights ruled on March 14, 2001, that the amnesty laws No. 26479 and No. 26492 were null and void as they violated the American Convention on Human Rights. This ruling had a broad …
Showing 1–13 of 13 events